In Eshelman v. Puma Biotechnology, No. 7:16-CV-18-D (ED NC June 7, 2017), Plaintiff sued Defendants Puma Biotechnology (“Puma”) and its CEO for libel per se and libel per quod based upon allegedly defamatory statements regarding a clinical trial scandal in February of 2016. Defendant Puma is a bio-pharmaceutical company focused on acquiring, developing, and commercializing ...
The post Motion for Sanctions Denied for Automatic Deletion of Browsing History appeared first on Plaintiff eDiscovery and eDiscovery Database Experts.