In Eshelman v. Puma Biotechnology, No. 7:16-CV-18-D (ED NC June 7, 2017), the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against Puma (and its CEO), the Defendant, for libel per se and libel per quod because of an allegedly defamatory presentation to investors in February of 2016. Puma, the Defendant is a biopharmaceutical company focused on acquiring, developing, ...
The post Where Browsing History Was Deleted Automatically and Unintentionally, Motion for Sanctions Was Denied appeared first on Plaintiff eDiscovery and eDiscovery Database Experts.